Iris is practice software for Australian general practice. This page sets out where we draw the line on AI, how information is protected, what patients can ask for, and exactly where we are not yet ready.
AI in Iris does paperwork. It does not make clinical decisions, and a clinician signs every AI draft before it goes into a record.
Why the line is here. Australian law treats software that recommends a diagnosis or treatment as a medical device. There is an exemption for clinical decision support shown to health professionals — but the TGA says an AI-generated recommendation cannot use it, and a clinician approving the output does not change that. So in September 2026 we removed three AI features that crossed the line (AI urgency triage, AI explanation of results, AI care-pathway answers) and replaced two of them with rule-based checks that show the clinician exactly what they checked, what they found and which guideline they come from.
Every AI draft is checked before a doctor signs it. Iris matches each sentence to what was actually said, looks for medicines, doses and safety-net advice that were added or left out, and makes the doctor tick off each flagged item before the note can be signed. Leaving things out is the most common scribe error, so we look for it specifically.
Every feature, its regulatory status and why. Kept in the product and checked on every release.
| Feature | Status | Conditions that keep it there |
|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||
From 10 December 2026 the Privacy Act requires practices to say when computer programs make, or substantially help make, decisions that significantly affect people. This is Iris’s part of that statement.
| AI function | Who uses it | Risk | Safeguards |
|---|
Sign-in is built to the Essential Eight Maturity Level 2 requirement for phishing-resistant multi-factor authentication (Australian Signals Directorate) and to the Australian Digital Health Agency’s session rules for clinical systems. Backups, patching and central logging are not yet independently assessed — see “Not ready yet”.
Under the Privacy Act and state health records laws (such as Victoria’s Health Records Act 2001), you can ask your practice for these. Iris is built so the practice can do them quickly.
Connections drop in the bush. Care shouldn’t.
Alignment is not certification. Where we say “aligned in design”, no independent body has assessed it yet.
| Framework | What it covers | Status |
|---|---|---|
| TGA medical device regulation (CDSS exemption, digital scribe guidance) | Where software becomes a medical device | Boundary enforced in code |
| Privacy Act 1988 (APPs), incl. automated-decision transparency from 10 Dec 2026 | Collection, use, security, access, correction, overseas disclosure | Aligned in design · residency gap |
| Health Records Act 2001 (Vic) and NSW HRIP Act 2002 | Health privacy principles, retention, transfer, practice closure | Aligned in design |
| ASD Essential Eight (Nov 2023 model) | Baseline cyber controls | MFA at ML2 · backups, patching, logging to do · device controls are the practice’s |
| ASD Information Security Manual; Secure by Design | Security controls and secure development | Partly |
| ADHA My Health Record Security Conformance Profile | Clinical systems connecting to My Health Record | Sign-in controls met · not connected |
| RACGP Standards for general practices (5th ed., C6.4; 6th ed. AI criterion) | Information security and AI use in practices | Supports the practice’s evidence |
| National AI Centre — Guidance for AI Adoption (six essential practices) | Accountability, impact, risk, transparency, testing, human control | AI register, kill switches, evaluation set |
| AS ISO/IEC 42001:2023; ISO/IEC 42005:2025 | AI management system; AI impact assessment | Aligned in design · not certified |
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022; ISO 27799 | Information security management | Planned |
| ISO 14971; IEC 62304; IEC 82304-1; IEC 81001-5-1; ISO 13485 | Medical-device risk, software lifecycle, health software safety and security, quality system | Planned — required for any regulated feature |
| ACSQHC AI Clinical Use Guide; AHPRA guidance on AI | Safe clinical use of AI | Consent, review, reporting built in |
What must happen before any real patient information is entered. We would rather tell you than have you find out.
Clinicians can report a problem with any AI draft or clinical check from the screen itself; the practice manager sees it with any regulatory reporting deadline.
/.well-known/security.txt when the Iris company is registered.